2017 Amendments Subject:-The Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) (Amendment) Rules, 2017 vide Notification No. GSR 629(E) dated 23rd June, 2017- Advisory for smooth Implementation- ITÂ is directed to refer to the amendments made in the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 vide GSR629(E) dated 23rd June, 2017, the advisory issued on 19.12.2017 to allow the industries
Latest Amendments NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 2nd November, 2021 G.S.R. 779(E) Short title and commencement. – (1) These rules may be called the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Amendment Rules, They shall come into force on the 1st day of April, 2022. In the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the said
Udham Singh and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh Indian Penal Code, 1860 – sections 343, 353 and 332 read with Section 34 – conviction and sentence of the petitioners of the offences under – in challenge – While the Inspector Weight & Measures, Mandi was checking weights and measures in the shop of petitioner,
The Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (Act No. 1 of 2010, dt 13-1-2010, w.e.f. 1-4-2011 has come into existence. This act was formally known as Standard of weight and measures Act,. This act is geared for making honest society and make consumer informative. Our main area of specialization is THE LEGAL METROLOGY (PACKAGD COMMODITIES) RULES 2011.
Issuance of notice – against the applicant for contravening the provisions of Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and Rules, 2011 – complaint filed without making any effort to collect the evidence against the applicant so as to make out a prima facie case against him – complaint quashed. (Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Issuance of process – against the applicant – for violation of Section 18(1) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 read with Rules 6(1), 2(m) of Legal Metrology (Package Commodity) Rules, 2011, punishable under Section 38(1) of the Act of 2009 as a product namely Package of Valve Kit kept for sale, on which M.R.P was
Labeling – incomplete address – the manufacturers failed to give the name of the State on the label of the brand (Red Label Tea) and have only mentioned the Pin Code – the provisions of Rule 10 providing for printing of Postal Address or Postal Index Number shall be deemed to be complete address for
Issuance of summons – for offences under the provisions of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 – Only the persons who are responsible for the conduct of the business of the Corporation shall be deemed to be guilty of the offences on behalf of the Corporation and shall be liable to be proceeded against
Karnataka Legal Metrology (Enforcement) Rules, 2011 – the petitioner was issued the licences for manufacture and repair of auto and taxi meters and also dealer license under Rule 3 – the Controller suspended the petitioner’s licenses for indulging in tampering of the auto and taxi fare meters with an intention to cheat the auto commuters
Legal Metrology – compounding fees not to be paid by Directors not nominated – the petitioner – Maruti Suzuki India Limited, challenges the orders of the Deputy Controller of Legal Metrology and the Controller of Legal Metrology, directing the 12 directors of the petitioner-company and the company to pay the compounding fees – the petitioner
Tap Here To Talk To Us