Legal Metrology (General) Act, 2009 read with the 2011 Rules – the petitioner has to approach the appropriate appellate forum in terms of the provisions – not inclined to entertain this petition. The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy (Deputy General Manager I.O.C. Ltd. & another vs. State of
Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities Rules), 2011 – compounding of offences in contravention of – although, Schedule XI of the Delhi Legal Metrology (Regulations) Rules, 2011 includes the offence of non-compliance of declaration in respect of pre-packaged commodity by manufacturer or dealer under section 18(1) of the Act. However, in the absence of any provision in
Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules – When the label does not contain the customer care number or the telephone number for enabling the customer to prefer such complaints, if any, it is a violation of Rule 6(2). (P.K. Vaidyars Vaidhya Ratna Prabha Vaidyasala Pvt. Ltd. & others vs. The State of Kerala & another.
Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 – pre-packed commodities in violation of the provisions of – no report of the summons been served on the petitioner – re-issue of summons to the accused directed. (Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd. and others vs. The State).
Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 – Rule 18 – whether violation of – charging of prices in excess of MRP – Rule 18 of the LMPC Rules comes under Chapter II of the LMPC Rules which chapter exclusively deals with the provisions applicable to packaged commodities intended for retail sale and the said chapter
Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 – Rule 3 – striking down the definitions of industrial consumer”and “institutional consumer”in Rule 3 as being contrary to the scheme of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and inconsistent with other provisions of the Rules – prayer for. (Kennametal India Limited and another vs. The Union of India and
Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 – Rule 32 (1) – Legal Metrology Act – section 36(1) – petition filed to quash the registration, continuation of all further proceedings and the order of taking cognizance and issue of process arising from the private complaint for the offences punishable under – petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Tirumala
Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 – Rule 6 – contravention of – omission of the word ‘Rs./’’from one of the packets containing rechargeable LED flash lights – the compounding fees prescribed as Rs. 25,000/- under Rule 32(3) of the packaged Commodities Rules is in conformity with the Act, hence , the respondents are justified
Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 – Rule 6(2) – breach of – telephone number of the customer care number was not mentioned on the packet of fire cracker – clear violation of mandatory declaration. (M/s Standard Fireworks Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State (NCT of Delhi)) Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 – Rule 6(2)
Legal Metrology is interesting field and has been implemented by India Government to protect the consumers so that they are getting fair deals. The aim of the Act is to create honest society where everyone works in transparent manner. The law has been made very strict and all offences are dealt under Criminal Regulation procedures.
Tap Here To Talk To Us